I think one of the main reasons many people
are against the death penalty is because of
those cases that have hit the headlines where
somebody has been put to death - only for it
to be found 'too late' that they were in fact
'innocent' of the crime.
Not so long back - we had a few cases where
mothers had been found guilty of killing their
children and sentenced to prison terms. After
spending several years in prison - it was found
that they were wrongly imprisoned. Now if those
mothers had been sentenced to death - no amount
of compensation could have made up for this terrible
miscarriage of justice.
I do agree though that prison is not working. People
get out and often re-offend almost immediately and
often these crimes are rape and other sexual assault/
abuse related or murder.
I think one of the major issues with out justice systems
is one of handing down sentences intended to 'deter'
future crimes of the same nature, especially the more
violent crimes. There is no 'consistency' in sentencing.
Two people commit identical murders but one will get
a much lighter sentence than the other. How can this be ?
A big issue I have with sentencing is the - so called
'Life Sentence'. This actually only amounts to about
20 years I think - and less than that when you take
'Parole' into account.
If we don't have the death sentence - we do need
something in place that would be just as big a deterrent,
but which - unlike the death sentence - can be revoked
should the person be found to have been wrongly convicted.